Breaking: Graphic YouTube Video Shows #Rittenhouse Running And An UnKnown Gunman Firing Shots in Air!
GeorgeTrue1 tweeted:
NYTimes "At 23:19, Rittenhouse is seen in this YouTube livestream. He's being chased into a parking lot. While he is being pursued, an unknown gunman fires the first shot into the air." IF running away & being chased down & guns are fired behind you by those people”
Ok and? Where’s the video? If I were there peacefully nothing to do with what you say but just to stand in protest and he shot me, would that have been justified. I don’t care if there were other people there with other intentions, that’s not a point of defense if he had shot me.
I was however able to get a copy of the video, I’m not sure if it is the same one George alluded to. You can view below and then read my comments below:
If you ask me it is the #protesters who need to claim #selfdefense. They were intimidated and felt as though they were in imminent danger as #Kyle engaged the crowd with his AK47. They chased after him out of fear of their lives with plastic bags and bottles, in an effort to get him to go away. But he slowly retreats firing killing 2
The guys he killed and injured would have separate cases. #Rittenhouse would have to defend against those 3 charges: what is he gonna say 🤔that it was in self-defense? That’s defeatist as he would have to prove that these 3 guys were deliberately attacking him with intent to kill. GUILTY
You have not justified his actions. If this video existed it does nothing to exonerate his actions. The persons whom he killed weren’t the people who attacked him. They weren’t pursuing him with intent to kill except one young man and a few others who were in chase as result of Kyles intimidation. In fact he was there with a rifle to oppose #peacefulprotest but got mixed up with engaging the wrong crowd who saw Kyle as a threat to their peaceful protest which Kyle turned into a battleground. In fact after going after the crowd of protesters then retreating killing 2 and injuring 2, he runs to the police who saw him as “no threat” after he took 2 lives. Gun shots were only fired in the air after Kyle has discharged his as shown by that video. But Kyle was clearly there to engage the protesters and incite them to the degree of violence so that he can discharge his gun run back to the safety of the police who ignored him and went after the protesters who were the actual victims.
Moreover, there’s a video that shows Rittenhouse first intimidating peaceful protesters with his gun and others trying to retaliate in defense by firing shots into the air. This indicates that he was there with the willful intention to stop the protest or create a situation where peaceful protest disintegrates into civil unrest ir violence which ultimately devolve in protesters killed and killers vilified and justifies.
The fact is that Kyle was there with an intent to kill. He tried to incite violence and to intimidate the protesters. The protesters were in fear if their lives as they felt threatened. The protesters retaliated out of fear throwing a paperback. Kyle responded by firing.
He can’t even claim self defense when he’s first underage and therefore is in illegal possession of a gun in public.
But our society is not foolish. We see those who are trying to create a situation to defeat change and reform through protest. We are intelligent enough to do our own investigation and examine the facts. Rittenhouse should not have been carrying a gun in the first place he’s underage. And secondly he has not right to allude to shots being fired by one someone who has nothing to do with the persons he killed. We are not children. Don’t punish us with stupidity.
Comments
Post a Comment